Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Monday, December 10, 2007
Yet another RANT
I've finally come to the last wedding pictures for this "season". As usual, I'll do a de-brief of things I learnt.Where I failed:
- Too tight crops of subjects. I was a little too desperate to capture certain expressions, so much so that I zoomed right into their faces. Not only does it look weird to have 6mpx worth of a face, the picture also fails to tell a story. Why did this person laugh? Why the funny expression? An excuse I can come up with is that with a small and dark viewfinder, I tend to zoom in more closely to look at the expressions. Crap, another excuse for a d300.
- Too much tilt shots. This is getting out of hand. An occasional tilt adds life to the set, but overdoing it resulted in a hap-hazard presentation. Stupid. In my tries for the perfect tilt, I screwed up many shots that would otherwise be ok. In addition, having too much tilt shots also shows that i lack maturity and proper composition skills.
- Poor focus. Can't be helped, I'll get the solution should a new wedding assignment draws near.
- Not observant of light. Mounting a flash results in being totally insensitive to light. I should also learn to add more direction to where my flash is bounced, but have to watch where I blast it at.
- Bias towards family members. I shot so many pictures of my relatives I find them sick. Should have paid more attention to other people. I still lack professionalism.
- Lazy. Somewhere into the dinner, I felt tired and began to think I've got enough shots. But the truth is, the later into the night, the livelier the crowd becomes, and the more opportunities there are. Haiz.
- Expression. Of course as I mentioned I get too tight expressions, but having expressions is still better than none at all. At least there is a little more variety compared to previous weddings.
- Exposure. Although I have no fast lens and hot bodies, I do have a good flash, helping me nail the exposure for the bread and butter group shots. I need to develop a way to flash without getting reflections from glasses though. An option would be off hand lighting, which is cumbersome.
- Workflow. I learnt to be more organized in picking out the better pictures and developing them, saving time (as if i'm in a hurry...lol)
Friday, December 7, 2007
Should I just stop here?
Another rant post, without photos. Weather isn't spectacular, and i'm not really in the mood to shoot anyway.
Almost done editing photos from the penang shoot. Thinking through what i've did so far, I'm forced to ask myself this qn: Should I stop?
I'm a cheapo. I keep holding back my purchases despite knowing how much they can help me improve. I keep thinking that I can shoot like a pro without the need for pro equipment, so long as i develop proper skills. All these because I know I will not go pro, and my equipment will never pay for itself.
Conventional, photojournalistic, documentary shots are now not much a problem. But they aren't challenging. Any bloke owning the right gear would nail them. To go beyond and shine, i'll really need to pump in big bucks.
1) Fast lens. At least a 2.8 zoom, or go for primes. I can contend myself with the flat flashed images, or go get some primes to shoot the really outstanding mood shots. The cheapest 2.8 zoom retails for 600++, and good primes will cost in excess of 1k.
2) Hot body. Either a d300, or get a canon 40d. I've seen how much a hot bod can help nail the shot. Not only with their fast fps, the superior AF system and low ISO noise will give me lots of advantages. Pros can laugh, quoting how they one-shot-one-killed in many situations, but they end up sporting a d2/1d series anyway.
3) Stable tripod. Call me a cheapo, but i'm still waiting for the super steady ballhead tripod retailing below 200 bucks.
But being a cheapo, I'm reluctant to spend. I don't want people to think I dunno how to prioritise my needs, buying exotic equipment just to get photos that don't earn money. It's all about satisfaction. It's just a hobby. Maybe I should just forget about all these and contend myself with normal pictures any tom dick and harry would get.
Sunday, December 2, 2007
Verdict - No D300, No more weddings!
It may sound really extreme. There are pros out there shooting d200 weddings, and maybe some d100/d70 pros as well. But in my case, i couldn't be more pissed than missing so many shots because of a body.
Smiles, kisses, handshakes, laughters; the very moments of joy and jubilation that defines a wedding reception all took place spontaneously and without warning. To me, it's like walking into a battlefield. Everywhere i turn, there's a scene crying to be shot, rare and precious memories waiting to be captured. I cannot fail. It's a once-in-a-lifetime thing.
While I am still far from psychic, I expect my equipment to be at least be as responsive as myself. When I point it at a face, it should lock focus, ok, at least try to achieve focus. But NO. The cam900 system took 0.5sec to START moving the focus, and then another 0.5-1sec to lock focus (if it managed to lock at all) This is like a gun that fires a sec after u pulled the trigger. I'm be better off dead.
The lower resolution of the cameras doesn't make them the ideal choice for group shots as well, especially when the iso1600 noise obscures the fine details.
Fortunately, Nikon's D300 seems like its made specially for the job. With its d2-beating AF system, and noise comparable to a Canon, it is the ideal and most logical upgrade for me. Sadly, very sadly, it retails for SGD2700, and it's unlikely to drop price anytime soon. Looks like i'll have to turn down wedding assignments till i saved up enough for the new toy.
Smiles, kisses, handshakes, laughters; the very moments of joy and jubilation that defines a wedding reception all took place spontaneously and without warning. To me, it's like walking into a battlefield. Everywhere i turn, there's a scene crying to be shot, rare and precious memories waiting to be captured. I cannot fail. It's a once-in-a-lifetime thing.
While I am still far from psychic, I expect my equipment to be at least be as responsive as myself. When I point it at a face, it should lock focus, ok, at least try to achieve focus. But NO. The cam900 system took 0.5sec to START moving the focus, and then another 0.5-1sec to lock focus (if it managed to lock at all) This is like a gun that fires a sec after u pulled the trigger. I'm be better off dead.
The lower resolution of the cameras doesn't make them the ideal choice for group shots as well, especially when the iso1600 noise obscures the fine details.
Fortunately, Nikon's D300 seems like its made specially for the job. With its d2-beating AF system, and noise comparable to a Canon, it is the ideal and most logical upgrade for me. Sadly, very sadly, it retails for SGD2700, and it's unlikely to drop price anytime soon. Looks like i'll have to turn down wedding assignments till i saved up enough for the new toy.
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Friday, November 16, 2007
Interior Architecture Photography

This is one aspect of photography where tripod is really important. And i really lack a quality one. (in fact my present one is so jialat i have fridge magnets stuffed into the legs to prevent it from slipping) Anyway, just saw some pros' works and they seemed to utilize subtle HDR for more pleasant highlights rendering, so here's my take on a landmark site at the upcoming terminal 3.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


